
by Senator Gaylord Nelson, Founder of Earth Day
What was the purpose of Earth Day? How did it start? These are the questions I am most frequently asked.
Actually, the idea for Earth Day evolved over a period of seven years
starting in 1962. For several years, it had been troubling me that the
state of our environment was simply a non-issue in the politics of the
country. Finally, in November 1962, an idea occurred to me that was, I
thought, a virtual cinch to put the environment into the political
"limelight" once and for all. The idea was to persuade President
Kennedy to give visibility to this issue by going on a national
conservation tour. I flew to Washington to discuss the proposal with
Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who liked the idea. So did the
President. The President began his five-day, eleven-state conservation
tour in September 1963. For many reasons the tour did not succeed in
putting the issue onto the national political agenda. However, it was
the germ of the idea that ultimately flowered into Earth Day.
I continued to speak on environmental issues to a variety
of audiences in some twenty-five states. All across the country,
evidence of environmental degradation was appearing everywhere, and
everyone noticed except the political establishment. The environmental
issue simply was not to be found on the nation's political agenda. The
people were concerned, but the politicians were not.
After President Kennedy's tour, I still hoped for some
idea that would thrust the environment into the political mainstream.
Six years would pass before the idea that became Earth Day occurred to
me while on a conservation speaking tour out West in the summer of
1969. At the time, anti-Vietnam War demonstrations, called "teach-ins,"
had spread to college campuses all across the nation. Suddenly, the
idea occurred to me - why not organize a huge grassroots protest over
what was happening to our environment?
I was satisfied that if we could tap into the
environmental concerns of the general public and infuse the student
anti-war energy into the environmental cause, we could generate a
demonstration that would force this issue onto the political agenda. It
was a big gamble, but worth a try.
At a conference in Seattle in September 1969, I announced
that in the spring of 1970 there would be a nationwide grassroots
demonstration on behalf of the environment and invited everyone to
participate. The wire services carried the story from coast to coast.
The response was electric. It took off like gangbusters. Telegrams,
letters, and telephone inquiries poured in from all across the country.
The American people finally had a forum to express its concern about
what was happening to the land, rivers, lakes, and air - and they did
so with spectacular exuberance. For the next four months, two members
of my Senate staff, Linda Billings and John Heritage, managed Earth Day
affairs out of my Senate office.
Five months before Earth Day, on Sunday, November 30,
1969, The New York Times carried a lengthy article by Gladwin Hill
reporting on the astonishing proliferation of environmental events:
"Rising concern about the environmental crisis is sweeping
the nation's campuses with an intensity that may be on its way to
eclipsing student discontent over the war in Vietnam...a national day
of observance of environmental problems...is being planned for next
spring...when a nationwide environmental 'teach-in'...coordinated from
the office of Senator Gaylord Nelson is planned...."
It was obvious that we were headed for a spectacular
success on Earth Day. It was also obvious that grassroots activities
had ballooned beyond the capacity of my U.S. Senate office staff to
keep up with the telephone calls, paper work, inquiries, etc. In
mid-January, three months before Earth Day, John Gardner, Founder of
Common Cause, provided temporary space for a Washington, D.C.
headquarters. I staffed the office with college students and selected
Denis Hayes as coordinator of activities.
Earth Day worked because of the spontaneous response at
the grassroots level. We had neither the time nor resources to organize
20 million demonstrators and the thousands of schools and local
communities that participated. That was the remarkable thing about
Earth Day. It organized itself.
President Obama is giving top billing to clean energy and green jobs as he promotes his $3.6 trillion budget plan.
Addressing a group of clean-tech entrepreneurs and researchers on Monday, the president noted that his proposed budget includes $150 billion over 10 years for direct investments in clean energy and efficiency, as well as $75 billion to make permanent a tax credit for research and experimentation. "At this moment of necessity we need you, we need inventiveness," he told the crowd.
"We can remain the world's leading importer of foreign oil, or we can become the world's leading exporter of renewable energy," Obama continued. "We can allow climate change to wreck unnatural havoc, or we can create jobs preventing its worst effects. We can hand over the jobs of the 21st century to our competitors, or we can create those jobs right here in America." The event was the first in a series of budget pep talks the president plans to give this week.
Read complete story here.
The move has drawn ire from Washington because it would mean that hundreds of thousands of acres would be off-limits for use in solar and wind power projects, which are at the core of the President's energy mission, and also important strides forward for the state, the LA Times is reporting. Feinstein's move is being seen by some Republicans as a mixed signal from the Dems about the party and the state's focus on renewable energy, and energy experts are also concerned this will be typical of the pace of progress on moving towards a green economy.
Read the complete story here.
Stimulus 'Green Jobs'
Money Flowing
After a tour of the Accu-Weld Replacement Window and Door Company, Mr. Rendell
signed a certification letter to U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu and another
letter to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC). The documents
included a promise to reduce energy consumption across the state.
Accu-Weld is one company whose production meets the energy efficiency standards
outlined in the stimulus act and has, therefore, seen demand for its products
increase. Mr. Rendell said five additional companies considered environmentally
friendly by the state are already receiving a total of $3.7 million in grants
from the stimulus, officially known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act (ARRA).
Read complete story here.
The 2009 New Mexico legislative session may be remembered by many as the one when the money stopped flowing and painful budget decisions had to be made. But renewable energy advocates say 2009 is actually the year when state government got on board the renewable energy bandwagon.
“We’re pleased about everything that happened — the solar energy incentives plus the green jobs bills,” said Mike Mattioli, principal with Consolidated Solar Technologies.
“When you look at the number of renewable energy bills that passed in the aggregate,” he continued, “it gives you reassurance that our legislators are not just talking the talk — they’re walking the walk too.”
Read complete story here.
NJ Officials and
Energy Leaders Talk Green Jobs
The national discussion about so-called green jobs is prompting
The state officials crafting the system to encourage conservation and reduce
greenhouse gas emissions
met Tuesday with their counterparts in the energy industry and with leaders of area job-training
programs.
Kenny Esser, Gov. Jon Corzine's chief energy adviser, said the first big
influx of green jobs is likely to be among energy auditors, who are supposed to
identify conservation opportunities in each of the state's 3 million buildings
by 2020.
As demand increases for wind and solar generation equipment, state officials
hope to attract the businesses making those devices to
Read the complete story here.
House Votes to Allow Road through
Statement by Cindy Shogan
Executive Director,
On House Passage of the Omnibus Public Lands Act of 2009, H.R.146
“House Bill H.R. 146 is a good bill brought low by its
sacrifice of the globally-significant Izembek National Wildlife Refuge for a
totally unnecessary road. For all the good this legislation will do, the road
provision jeopardizes every acre of new and existing Wilderness in
“The plan to carve a road through the heart of this internationally-recognized wildlife feeding and breeding ground already has been killed once by Congress, and for good reason. The road was a terrible idea in 1998, when it was expressly prohibited by law, and it remains a terrible idea today. Not only will it severely harm the Izembek and its surrounding wilderness area, it will establish a horrible precedent that could pave the way for more paving in other protected wilderness areas.
”The ‘Road to Nowhere’ through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge would punch a road through the heart of the Wilderness Act itself.”
Background:
A decade ago, Congress found that a road through this epic
place was not in the public interest. Instead, Congress voted to send $37
million to the tiny
